Five years ago one of my clients bought a new home pre-construction while he lived in his then current Florida homestead. The builder told him the new home would take 18 months to build. The builder finished early, in 12 months, and wrote my client a letter saying the home was soon complete and that under the construction contract he must purchase the new home in 30 days. The client had not yet put the existing home on the market (in the old days, it took only a month or two to sell a house). So, the client closed on the new home, then put the old home on the market. Three months after moving he sold the old home. He used all the sales proceeds to reduce the principal balance of the new mortgage on the new house. Now, he wants to file Chapter 7 bankruptcy and asks whether transferring the sales proceeds to the new house is a fraudulent transfer.
When the debtor moved to the new home he moved his homestead. The hold home ceased to be an exempt homestead property when the debtor moved in to the newer home as his principal residence. The use of sales proceeds to pay down the homestead mortgage was a conversion of non-exempt money to an exempt asset. The transfer cannot be attacked under Florida fraudulent transfer statutes because it occurred five years ago, beyond the statute of limitations. However, conversion of money to a homestead property within 10 years of filing bankruptcy may be avoided under bankruptcy law if the debtor intended to pay down his mortgage to avoid creditor claims.
Even though this occurred within the 10 year bankruptcy window, I do not think what this debtor did with his old house could reasonably be undone as a fraudulent conversion. The conversion of money into a homestead is reversible only if the debtor had actual intent to defraud creditors. This transaction does not appear to be a plan to defraud creditors or a bankruptcy trustee. This transaction looks like a normal person moving into a new home in a normal manner. Obviously, this debtor intended to sell his old home and use the money to buy a new home. Only because the home was ready unexpectedly early did the debtor have to move first and sell second.
There are many ways where you can make credit mistakes which can harm your credit score at times mildly and at times severely. It is important that you are aware of the common mistakes frequently committed and which can be avoided so that you can escape from the frustration, tension and save huge amount of money. The more you are aware of the mistakes and have enough information about the credit scores, the better you will be able to handle your finances and credit scores. Some of the common mistakes that can harm your credit score drastically are:
Question: I have been divorced for 5 years now and my ex-husband declared bankruptcy in June. He has a business and let the credit line go to $30,000.00. Since he declared bankruptcy they are now coming after me since I had signed a personal guarantee, he also did. I was taken off the business and bank account but not the personal guarantee. Is there anything that I can do other than declare bankruptcy? My divorce lawyer has done nothing other than suggest bankruptcy and another lawyer suggested we sue him.
Answer: Since your ex-husband is bankrupt, there is no point in suing him; any amounts he owes to the banks would be included in his bankruptcy. You have three options:
First, you could attempt to work out a settlement with the bank. If you tell them you are considering bankruptcy and they will get nothing, they may be willing to settle for less than the full amount owing.
Second, if you have income and assets and don’t want to go bankrupt, you could file a consumer proposal. A consumer proposal deals with all of your debts (not just the one you guaranteed for your ex husband), and if successful you end up with one monthly payment.
Third, if that’s not possible, then yes, bankruptcy is an option. You should arrange a no charge initial consultation with an Ontario bankruptcy trustee to determine which option is right for you.
Here’s a question from a bankruptcy attorney in South Florida which touches upon an important and very basic concept for the bankruptcy means test. The attorney states that he represents a Chapter 7 client who has been in a domestic partnership for a long time. He and his partner have two children. The client claims himself and one of the children as a dependant for income tax purposes. The attorney asks if the debtor includes only his income and the expenses of the child he claims as tax dependent, or household income.
The answer is household income. For bankruptcy purposes, the debtor’s household includes all the people living in the home as a primary residence regardless of whom is claimed as a dependent for tax purposes. This debtor’s means test should include everyone’s income and everyone’s household and living expenses.
Now, I’m no math expert; that’s why I went to law school. The other day, I heard someone mention that they were tired of the medical bills they were receiving and they were just going to pay those medical bills with credit cards. Unbelievable. You’re of above level intelligence if you’re reading this post because you can turn on your computer, log onto the internet and search for information about relevant subjects that interest you; right? Then, what makes you think that using your credit card, with an interest rate of about 10% or more, to pay off a debt with 0% interest is a good idea? Am I missing something here?
Too often people are led to the wrong conclusions about money and can’t figure out how they got themselves into the messes they created. Stop and think about it. It “feels” good to pay off a debt. What’s missing is that more debt is being created to “feel” good momentarily. Don’t let your emotions get the best of you when making financial decisions.
Another financial mistake would be to pay those medical bills with your retirement accounts; 401k, 403b, IRA, or Roth IRA account. I don’t care how you’re saving for retirement, that money is not for medical bills now; it’s for your future. Never, and I emphasize NEVER, touch your retirement accounts until you retire.
Medical bills and credit card debts are always dischargeable in bankruptcy and your retirement accounts are safe from being taken by the trustee to pay those debts. So, if the Courts can’t touch your money to pay your bills, why should you?
The Federal Trade Commission recently settled a case involving an online payday lending service that apparently tricked consumers into spending much more than they wanted to – and into giving the company permission to take payments directly from their bank accounts.
Here’s a look at how the scam worked and what will happen to the scammer.
According to the FTC’s website, the scam went like this:
The result of all this devious Internet trickery was that many customers ended up paying far more than they intended to for payday loans, which themselves are often a money source of last resort for people in or headed for serious financial trouble.
The good news here is the FTC settled with both companies for hefty fines ($52,000 for the debit card company and $850,000 for the payday loan company).
Generally speaking, most financial gurus advise people against taking out payday loans if at all possible, because of the enormous interest rates often attached to them and the unpleasant and burdensome debt cycle they can lead to. If you’re in need of cash, before you turn to a payday lender, consider:
Though legislators and consumer advocacy groups like the FTC have been cracking down on payday lenders in recent years, payday loans are still often too expensive to be useful, and may land you in a debt pattern difficult to break with filing for bankruptcy.
We are constantly being reminded that celebrities, who make millions, also have tough time paying their bills. Apparently these celebrities are no different than you and me when it comes to balancing their checkbooks.
Mc Hammer blew his fortunes with extravagant spending. This Hip-Hop Artist, filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in 1996 because he did not have the income to support his lavish lifestyle in addition to defending all the lawsuits that were filed against him.
Her situation was a bit different than Mc Hammer. Lorrain Bracco found herself in an unexpected and unavoidable legal situation where a long custody battle with now ex-husband Harvey Keitel, has left the star bankrupt in 1999.
After retiring from boxing and going through a nasty divorce, the former Heavyweight champ literally found his finances in disarray. Leading to his 2003 bankruptcy, Tyson blamed lavish spending on cars, mansions, poor financial advice plus management embezzlement of his fortune.
Even Donald Trump found himself in financial difficulty in 2004 and again in 2009. Trump’s Atlantic City hotel and Resort Company filed Chapter 11 bankruptcy twice in order to reorganize debts related to construction.
Braxton known for her sultry sexy voice filed a lawsuit against LaFace Records, attempting to gain release from a contract she felt was no longer fair. LaFace countersued and this led to Braxton filing for bankruptcy. Braxton spent most of 1998 in legal limbo.
According to the Guinness Book of World Records, radio talk show host Larry King has interviewed over 30,000 people. He spent outrageous amounts of money which left in a $352,000 debt for which he had to file bankruptcy.
Famous for his role as Cousin Eddie in the National Lampoon’s Vacation movies, had a rough decade. He ran into money problems and filed bankruptcy in 2000, ironically over a film called “The Debtors.”
In 2004, this former Renegade and soap opera star filed bankruptcy for debts that included $200,000 for a private jet. He also owed on a Harley-Davidson motorcycle, a H2 Hummer, and alimony for his four ex-wives.
Stephen Baldwin was the youngest brother of the famous acting family. However, his salary was not enough for the actor to keep up on his mortgage and other debts. In 2009, Baldwin and his wife filed bankruptcy.
Kim Basinger filed for bankruptcy in 1993 when a judge ordered her to pay Main Line Pictures $8.1 million because she had backed out of a verbal agreement to star in Boxing Helena.
It’s clear that financial problems doesn’t discriminate among people no matter what the income bracket or line of work is and can affect any of us at any time in our lives. Stay tuned because the future will bring more tales of once rich and famous celebrities filing for bankruptcy.
Generally speaking it is difficult, almost impossible, to discharge a student loan in bankruptcy. The debtor has to show “undue hardship”, and if you are physically able to go to work you will have difficulty showing undue hardship. Except that a few years ago one Arizona debtor was able to discharge part of his student loans in a Chapter 13 case.
Here’s what happened. The debtor put his student loan in a five year Chapter 13 plan. The student loan lender received notice of the plan in the normal course of the bankruptcy. The student loan lender did not object to the plan. After the debtor completed his Chapter 13 and the court issued a discharge order the student loan lender went after the debtor’s income tax refunds to collect the student loan. The creditor claimed that the debtor could not discharge any part of the student loan unless he filed a separate adversary complaint within the bankruptcy proceeding alleging undue hardship.
The bankruptcy court said the balance of the debtor’s student loan was discharged even though the debtor neither claimed nor proved undue hardship in the bankruptcy case. The court said that the lender cannot collect the student loan after the Chapter 13 discharge because the lender had proper notice and never objected to the debtor’s plan.
Although you cannot assume your student loan lender will similarly fail to scrutinize your own Chapter 13 plan, this case suggests that it may make sense to include student loans in a Chapter 13 plan. The same result will not apply to Chapter 7 where creditors with non-dischargeable loans do not have to intervene in order to protect their rights after the Chapter 7 discharge. See, 553 F 3d 1193